Can they ask you if you are gay in court

Pitcherskaia v. Amanfi v. You should always consult an attorney regarding your matter. INS , F. Hernandez-Montiel v. Kimumwe v. Galicia v. Joaquin-Porras had obtained advance parole through a fraudulent marriage which may have predisposed the courts against him, and State Department reports for Costa Rica show it to be a more tolerant country than others in Latin America.

Ashcroft , F. In this case the applicant, a man from Ghana who feared he would be ritually sacrificed, engaged in a homosexual act with another man, knowing that this would lead to his being spared the sacrifice. The Court found that he was jailed because of sexual misconduct, not homosexual identity.

In this case Reyes-Reyes was a gay man with a female sexual identity from El Salvador who had been kidnapped, beaten and raped by non-government actors because of his sexual orientation. The Supreme Court extended LGBTQ+ rights rapidly. The Court remanded for further proceedings on his CAT and withholding claims.

Last updated: November 25, Remember, every asylum application is unique and very dependent on the specific facts of the case, so, just because another applicant won or lost from a particular country does not mean that another applicant from the same country will have the same outcome.

The Court recognized his imputed membership in a particular social group and remanded the case for further investigation on his claim of persecution. In addition, many states and cities have laws that ban this kind of discrimination. Reyes-Reyes v. Karouni v. The information contained herein is for reference only and may not be up to date.

After he was spared, however, he was mistreated because the authorities believed he was gay. Salkeld v. The Court found it significant that Salkeld himself had never experienced physical violence, there are no laws against homosexuality in Peru, and there are some regions in Peru which are relatively safer for gay people than others.

Gonzales , F. Boer-Sedano v. A span of less than three decades separates a decision upholding a state law criminalizing homosexual conduct from the decision that legalized gay marriage nationwide. This case serves as a cautionary tale that bad facts make bad law.

Gonzalez , F. Joaquin-Porras v. Gebremaria v. Toboso-Alfonso was a gay man from Cuba who suffered various abuses at the hands of his government, including being forced to participate in a labor camp. Morales v. It does not constitute legal advice. Some courts have ruled that Title VII also bans discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

The Court’s reasoning focused on the text of Title VII, which forbids discrimination “because of sex.” The majority opinion explained that it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being gay or transgender without also discriminating against them based on their sex.

Ornelas Chavez v. In a landmark win for LGBTQ people, the Supreme Court today ruled that firing employees because of their sexual orientation or gender identity is sex discrimination that violates federal law. Molathwa v. The Supreme Court recently announced it will take up this question in three cases.