Parents dont accept im gay yahoo answeres

Where were you calling for his resignation as a bigot? Hey, there's no civil right to a CEO job. If you’re struggling with your mental health or need further help navigating difficult family dynamics, try connecting with a therapist, counselor, or other behavioral health expert who specializes in family issues or LGBTQ+ care.

So no CEO job for him. If he's shown himself to be incompetent at the job, he won't get another one. The next time some religious group throws out an employee or leader because he donated money to planned parenthood or gay rights group, remember this day for you laid the foundation.

If the parents of your gf are more accepting of same sex relationships, tell them, although from what you wrote that doesn't sound very likely. Well, not the magnitude of the response, but the fact that in Silicon Valley it would be viewed negatively, that's obvious.

I wouldn't be surprised if no major company would want to hire him for a public position now, lest they suffer the same public backslash. Given the number of millionaire VC's alone that have come out supporting him on Twitter, I kind of doubt he'll face anything resembling McCarthy level persecution.

Brendan Eich can donate to whatever causes he wishes, and rightfully so, but there is rightly no protection from the public opinion based consequences arising from those donations. Well, McCarthy era victims were also able to find the odd job here and there. So, are you saying Obama had an epiphany and has suddenly discovered the errors of his ways?

Actually, it's the above that shows lack of understanding of what was wrong about McCarthyism. To help them navigate this journey, it is important to acknowledge their feelings and understand that rejection doesn't mean the end of their relationship. Equally, justifications such as "meritocracy" imply that being a CEO is a very narrow thing - it isn't, it's a position of authority and leadership, and if you can't near universally inspire confidence in the people you're intended to lead, that is a problem with your ability to function as CEO.

But I'm also utterly opposed to railroading people out of work because of personal opinions they hold. Parents of LGBTQ+ children may face mixed emotions when it comes to their coming out as queer. Even if people would only got fired from one job and left alone after that, McCarthyism would have been as bad.

Dealing with unaccepting family members can be painful and challenging, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Given recent events in Florida, with the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, it was about time to talk about dealing with those who do not accept you. While the old "may not agree with what you say but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" trope gets used here, it doesn't mean you need to protect people from the consequences of their speech.

Otherwise, look up help hotlines. It also shows a lack of understanding of the ramifications against Eich. I'll give you that. JoeAltmaier on April 4, root parent prev next [—]. Igniting a firestorm of protest by contributing significant bucks to support a hate law, is something he could have seen coming a mile away.

McCarthyism is about the practice, not about if the effects are in full force or not. They usually know what they are talking about as long as you don't get an ultra christian help-me-I-am-gay-how-do-I-cure-this-hotline. So, while past studies have indicated that acceptance of your child’s identity can lead to better outcomes in mental health, school, or drug use and abuse, it is clear that there are still those out there that will struggle to accept us for who we are.

If you don't see the difference between people being upset about having a known supporter of discrimination in a role where he is shaping public opinion about an organisation like Mozilla, and the person ultimately responsible for a workplace vs. As for being "paraded to confess their "sins"" that has already been done -- Eich was forced to confess his sins in public posts and promise he'll be good as if he gave any indication that he was bad in the workplace all these years in this regard.

Their PR persons will tell them not to touch him with a ten-foot pole. It wasn't that the blacklisting was total "throughout the industry" , it was that the blacklisting existed at all. So, now, leaders in the business world have to conform to the most vocal group or else face professional harassment?

Well, in his case the commitee wasn't "congressional", it was a tech media one. Today tyranny gained a toehold. You also realize that there are many gay people who are against gay marriage, right? So, when the illegal immigrant situation blows up, are you saying that anyone that supports "legal" immigration and isn't outspoken about it must be professionally disgraced?

So, he doesn't conduct his personal life in a way that can reflect positively on the board and stockholders. We haven't failed him. What is your proof that he was discriminating against people, or a "known supporter of discrimination?